Oh No! The Peasants are Revolting!

This letter is a response to ConsCom Member, Ms Jessica Gugino’s letter in the Public Spirit of May 13, 2011.

What came to be known as Article 38 began last summer when the Conservation Commission told neighbors on Calvin Street that they had no money to treat the weeds on the pond.  At that time, they challenged us to come up with money.  They implied we should walk around the pond and pass the hat.

So from September to April, we managed to organize under the name Friends of Flannagan Pond (FOFP), we circulated a petition, we secured a place on the Town Meeting warrant, and we did receive a favorable hearing from the Selectmen and the Finance Committee (until some waffled at Town Meeting).  Our agenda never changed from September, right up to Town Meeting, to get $35,000 in the FY2012 budget for the purpose of weed treatment, exclusively for Flannagan Pond, for Spring 2012.  This was our goal, this is what we strived for, and this is what we came to Town Meeting for.   All of this was well documented over all these months on our web page (www.saveourpond.wordpress.com). It has been in the open.

On May 9th we arrived at Town Meeting.  We were the last article of the evening, not by our own choice. And what did we ask for?  The same exact thing we had asked for last summer and the same thing that was in our petition: funding for the pond cleanup in FY2012!  And Finance Committee Members acted surprised, Selectmen acted surprised and Conservation Commission members (those who bothered to show up for Town Meeting) acted surprised. Why were they surprised?

The issue is that there were two separate and distinct actions; and two separate and distinct timelines; initiated by two separate and distinct organizations.  

The UDAG money was presented for Spring 2011; our Warrant Article has always been focused on Spring 2012.

The UDAG funds are also not exclusively for Flannagan Pond weed control, but for dam management and for a new pond management plan (for all the ponds, the very “global” solution that ConsCom and FinCom claimed they wanted at the town meeting). Also, the UDAG funds were never ever offered in exchange for us surrendering Article 38.  It is also worth noting that the UDAG issue was initiated by the Board of Selectmen, not FOFP.

Regarding Article 38; I had never been asked to remove it from the Warrant. The petition was our single weapon from the first day we convened, we stayed the course, and we never wavered.  I had never given thought to pulling Article 38 because it belonged to 100 people who signed it with the expectation that I would fight for it.  Losing on the Town Meeting floor was acceptable; quitting and abandoning those who entrusted us to run with it was not.

Ms. Gugino said, “I support an ongoing weed management program for Ayer’s ponds, all of them…” Yet the ConsCom had issued an RFP for weed treatment for exclusively for Sandy Pond and Pine Meadow weeks before.  Flanagan Pond was excluded!  Why?  A lack of funds.  So why would you vote against long term funding.

She said, “I don’t like the fact that neither the BOS nor the FOFP consulted with the ConsCom (on which I serve) until the UDAG funding and/or placement of Article 38 on the Warrant were both done deals.”  The last I checked the BOS does not report to ConsCom.  The last I checked UDAG funds are at the sole discretion of the BOS.  The last I checked, the Citizens right to Petition is part of the First Amendment and not subject to ConsCom approval.

She said, “I don’t like the fact that so many people, including members of the BOS and FinCom, were left with the mistaken impression that they were recommending only an expenditure of $35,000, not $70,000.”  Well the fact of the matter is that they were recommending only $35,000!!!  UDAG funds were not part of the discussion; they were not part of the equation.  UDAG is FY2011; Town Meeting Budget is FY2012.

Regarding certain BOS, ConsCom and FinCom members questioning our integrity; we have posted our game plan publicly on our web page since September 2010.  Our Meetings with all these Boards were televised.  The issue is that these board members did not pay attention and they did not connect the dots, and they were embarrassed. Others made the ultimate mistake; they failed to show up on Game Day and lost by one vote!

Ms Gugino is ticked because after being rebuffed by ConsCom last summer, we did what any free-thinking person would do, we petitioned a broken bureaucracy and worked around the obstacle, and we never returned to pay homage.

So let’s stay on topic here; FOFP did not make Article 38 the last article of the evening.  FOFP is not responsible for the meeting going past 10:00 PM.  FOFP is not responsible for people leaving early. FOFP never ever stated we wanted to be like Sandy Pond.  FOFP had no reason to accept a compromise offered by Ms. Conley.  FOFP is not responsible for brain synapses misfiring. FOFP is also not responsible for Ms Gugino’s lack of understanding regarding Rules of Order.  To suggest that the Town “had been taken advantage of” by free citizens exercising their rights at a Town Meeting is absolutely repugnant.

Chuck

Advertisements

About saveourpond

I am a lifelong resident of Ayer who lives on Flanagan's Pond.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Oh No! The Peasants are Revolting!

  1. Denise Simion says:

    BRAVO!

    Well written and this speaks for me as well – I hope they remember that not only are we all citizens with first amendment rights but we VOTE too. The citizens who are engaged in their community are the ones most likely to vote, it would be to their advantage to take heed. I will remember who said what and who did what with the next election. The irony is that most in public service complain about the apathy of the community and then complain when citizens rally around a cause.

    As a personal note: Chuck, thank you for your hard work and perseverance. I noticed that the weeds are already starting to grow in this season I hope they will not use some bureaucratic loophole to stop 2011 treatment.

    To all who enjoy our little piece of nature remember it is your responsibility to be engaged in your community (and not just pay taxes).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s